edgy goatee: Redfin ?Offer Insights?: Concerns Raised Over Online Posting Of ...

Controversial New Internet Practice Raises Confidentiality Concerns & Realtor? Scorn

The internet based real estate brokerage company, Redfin, is now arming buyers and sellers with insight into the negotiations that take place when the firm?s clients submit winning ? and losing ? offers to buy a home. On its heavily trafficked website, the Seattle-based brokerage is now displaying ?Offer Insights? detailing intimate details of negotiations surrounding offers that Redfin agents submit on listings. Redfin claims that buyers can opt out of the program, and no addresses are revealed before closing. (But, addresses are shown for sold properties).

Here is an example for two properties in Quincy, one where an offer was accepted and one where it was rejected:

redfin offer insights copy

Confidentiality & Ethical Concerns?

From a strategic and marketing perspective, this new idea is certainly creative, as it gives Redfin agents and their potential clients a competitive advantage over other agents and aids in providing transparency in the marketplace. However, posting details about private contractual negotiations raises some thorny legal and ethical concerns, and many non-Redfin agents are crying foul.

Some Realtors assert that the details of offer negotiations are private and confidential, and therefore, cannot be disclosed without the consent of all parties to the transaction. I don?t necessarily buy into that. I?m not aware of any legal confidentiality protection given to private contract negotiations ? indeed they are 100% discoverable in litigation. A buyer and seller are in an adversarial position, so there is no special legal relationship between them warranting a duty to keep negotiations private. A seller (and a creative attorney), however, could manufacture a tortious interference claim if a Redfin Offer Insight proves to interfere with a potential deal with another party. That?s a lawsuit for another day?

Other Realtors say that the Redfin practice violates Multiple Listing Service rules and the NAR Code of Ethics. Multiple listing services have rules for commenting on sites which contain MLS information. A seller may instruct her listing agent to disallow public comments on listings. A Redfin buyer?s agent could be in violation of MLS rules if he leaves remarks about the house or negotiation, according to some non-Redfin agents. It will be up to the particular MLS to enforce its own rules against agents; they have no legal effect per se.

The National Association of Realtors Code of Ethics prohibits Realtors from?using confidential information of clients for the Realtor?s advantage or the advantage of third parties unless the clients consent after full disclosure. The catch is that ?confidential information? is defined as whatever state law says is confidential. ?As I said earlier, private contract negotiations are not legally confidential in Mass., so I?m doubtful this would apply.

In sum, the Redfin Offer Insight feature may well be legal, but tight-walks through the ethical rules governing MLS?s and Realtors. As long as they don?t disclose names or property addresses until the deal closes, I think it?s ok, and I do appreciate giving buyers as much market information as possible. On the flip side, it may put non-Redfin listing agents at a competitive disadvantage. Maybe that?s why they are crying foul?

Agents, what are your thoughts? Post your comments below.

______________________________________________________

Richard D. Vetstein, Esq. is a nationally recognized real estate attorney who writes frequently about legal issues facing the real estate industry. He can be reached at?info@vetsteinlawgroup.com.